| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Arrays of Complex Types |
| Date: | 2007-03-04 00:48:38 |
| Message-ID: | 45EA1766.8020808@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
David Fetter wrote:
> Per your earlier suggestion in IRC, I'm picturing a polymorphic
> function like
>
> pg_catalog.array_for(typepoid OID)
> pg_catalog.array_for(typename NAME)
> pg_catalog.array_for(typenamespace NAME, typename NAME)
>
> I don't see a good reason to allow putting array types in a different
> schema from their base types.
>
>
Actually, I think I prefer Martijns simple SQL extension suggestion better.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ryan Cumming | 2007-03-04 02:25:02 | Trivial HugeTLB Benchmark |
| Previous Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2007-03-04 00:25:20 | IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-04 03:57:02 | Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |
| Previous Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2007-03-04 00:25:20 | IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |