From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] WITH/RECURSIVE plans |
Date: | 2007-03-02 20:00:58 |
Message-ID: | 45E8827A.5020802@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:52:14AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Unfortunately we (the community) will not have WITH/RECURSIVE for 8.3.
>> However I have spoken with a Alexey and Alvaro and Command Prompt has
>> decided to make WITH/RECURSIVE a priority for 8.4.
>
> Any chance we can get WITH without RECURSIVE? That would be very
> handy all by itself.
I don't think that we are comfortable committing to that. I will talk
with Alvaro and see what he thinks.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Casey Duncan | 2007-03-02 20:15:53 | Large aggregate query running out of memory in ExecutorState |
Previous Message | Adam Rich | 2007-03-02 19:53:28 | Custom session variables? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2007-03-02 20:08:08 | Re: Google SoC: lots of discussion, very few mentors |
Previous Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2007-03-02 19:55:25 | Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |