From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shiva Sarna <shivasarna(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: increasing database connections |
Date: | 2007-03-01 15:47:28 |
Message-ID: | 45E6F590.6040604@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:49:14AM -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>> On 3/1/07, Shiva Sarna <shivasarna(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:
>>> I am sorry if it is a repeat question but I want to know if database
>>> performance will decrease if I increase the max-connections to 2000. At
>>> present it is 100.
>> Most certainly. Adding connections over 200 will degrade performance
>> dramatically. You should look into pgpool or connection pooling from
>> the application.
>
> Are you sure? I've heard of at least one installation which runs with
> 5000+ connections, and it works fine.
We have one that high as well and it does fine. Although I wouldn't
suggest it on less than 8.1 ;). 8.2 handles it even better since 8.2
handles >8 cores better than 8.1.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2007-03-01 19:39:09 | Re: Identical Queries |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-03-01 15:45:00 | Re: Dead Space Map version 2 |