From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Madison Kelly <linux(at)alteeve(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB |
Date: | 2007-02-26 17:04:00 |
Message-ID: | 45E31300.4070701@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Madison Kelly wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am asking in this list because, at the end of the day, this is a
> performance question.
>
> I am looking at writing a search engine of sorts for my database. I
> have only ever written very simple search engines before which amounted
> to not much more that the query string being used with ILIKE on a pile
> of columns. This was pretty rudimentary and didn't offer anything like
> relevance sorting and such (I'd sort by result name, age or whatnot).
>
> So I am hoping some of you guys and gals might be able to point me
> towards some resources or offer some tips or gotcha's before I get
> started on this. I'd really like to come up with a more intelligent
> search engine that doesn't take two minutes to return results. :) I
> know, in the end good indexes and underlying hardware will be important,
> but a sane as possible query structure helps to start with.
See search.postgresql.org, you can download all source from
gborg.postgresql.org.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Thanks all!!
>
> Madison
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-02-26 17:08:03 | Re: low memory usage reported by 'top' indicates poor tuning? |
Previous Message | Mark Stosberg | 2007-02-26 16:52:09 | low memory usage reported by 'top' indicates poor tuning? |