Re: SCMS question

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Warren Turkal <wt(at)penguintechs(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SCMS question
Date: 2007-02-24 22:12:39
Message-ID: 45E0B857.2070003@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Saturday 24 February 2007 00:55, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> AFAIK, git still does not support windows properly[1], which I would say
>> is a killer... Unless you can of course to everything you need through
>> one of those frontend protocols, but if you can do everything that way
>> then why would you need git in the first place?
>>
>
> You might be able to get the cvs functionality. That's not necessarily
> everything you could have, but it means that you can operate without losing
> functionality for some developers while increasing functionality for a number
> of developers. I think would be a pretty good thing.
>
>

I would not be at all happy with making such a compromise. Proper
support for all the platforms we build on is an absolute prequisite, as
far as I am concerned. I'm not prepared to treat Windows as a
second-class citizen.

I also think that if we change to another SCM it should be something in
widespread use in FOSS systems - ideally also something supported
already in many distributions.

As I said earlier, there is no hurry.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-24 22:18:16 Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question)
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-02-24 21:26:55 Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question)