Re: What is CheckPoint.undo needed for?

From: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Postgresql-General <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What is CheckPoint.undo needed for?
Date: 2007-02-23 15:10:47
Message-ID: 45DF03F7.9040407@phlo.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> I think you should increase pg_control version.
>
> And the WAL page-header version, since this also changes WAL contents.

Here is an updated version. I've incremeted XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC and
PG_CONTROL_VERSION by one.

greetings, Florian Pflug

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg.noundo.patch text/plain 5.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-23 15:30:40 Re: SCMS question
Previous Message hendrik 2007-02-23 15:01:46 Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question