From: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <richard(at)levitte(dot)org> |
Cc: | andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, monotone-devel(at)nongnu(dot)org, wt(at)penguintechs(dot)org, stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question |
Date: | 2007-02-22 16:38:26 |
Message-ID: | 45DDC702.4060205@bluegap.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Richard,
you should probably have read the thread on the PostgreSQL -hackers
mailing list I've linked to... at least you didn't make Tom's point ;-)
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> 1. Do you want to stay with CVS or do you want to move to something
> else?
Most PostgreSQL developers currently want to stay with CVS. Only some
desperate souls including myself are fiddling with other VCSes.
> 3. What would you want a replacement to be able to do?
That's being debated, with many voices saying: CVS (plus our own
hackery) provides all we need. (And be warned again: as soon as you
point out an advantage of your favourite VCS, you're making Tom's point.
;-) )
> So far, I'm getting the sense that there are a lot of opinions on what
> replacement system to use, a bit carelessly before having answered the
> above questions thoroughly.
How did you get that impression? I'm currently *using* monotone for
Postgres-R development, doing cvs_import and propagating to my branch.
And I know others did the same already, too.
Regards
Markus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-02-22 17:02:24 | Re: What is CheckPoint.undo needed for? |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD | 2007-02-22 16:30:24 | Re: Column storage positions |