From: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tim Tassonis <timtas(at)cubic(dot)ch> |
Cc: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: php professional |
Date: | 2007-02-22 16:00:47 |
Message-ID: | 45DDBE2F.4080201@wildenhain.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
totally off topic,
Tim Tassonis schrieb:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> My definition is, "toy used/trumpeted by pseudo-professionals as a
>> professional tool, when it just doesn't measure up".
>
> Boah, here surely speaks a true professional playing in the league of
> Donald Knuth or even Alan Kay, as opposed to all the pseudos like me out
> there.
>
> Is it Assembler or Smalltalk you write your web pages with?
No, python, java ;)
> PHP absolutely is a professional tool as a scripting language, of course
> with all the downsides of any scripting language. I'll choose php over
Well no. PHP is not a professional language because it has no really
design - and that has nothing to do with the fact it beeing a scripting
language. Its a bad scripting language. (Say namespaces for example,
confusing function interfaces, unicode flaws, missing usable frameworks,
silly type handling, quoting hell)
> Perl any day, as it is syntactically much cleaner and performs
> sufficiently well for usual scripting needs.
ah... yes. Dont like perl either but its at least carrying some
actual language design.
> Of course, I wouldn't write an operating system with it.
Would you write a language with it? :-)
Btw, "professional programmers" can indeed use funny languages
- they are professional by they earning their living with it.
T.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-02-22 16:01:18 | Re: Slony subscription problem |
Previous Message | Joris Dobbelsteen | 2007-02-22 15:43:34 | Re: Guarenteeing ordering constraints |