Re: 8.2 Admin Pack broken?

From: "Andy Shellam (Mailing Lists)" <andy(dot)shellam-lists(at)mailnetwork(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Admin Mailing List <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 Admin Pack broken?
Date: 2007-02-17 17:45:51
Message-ID: 45D73F4F.6070500@mailnetwork.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Andy Shellam (Mailing Lists)" <andy(dot)shellam-lists(at)mailnetwork(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>
>> FYI: Reports on Google are wrong - they say that you need to use "gmake"
>> to build the PostgreSQL server source. You don't.
>>
>
> I can assure you that you need GNU make to build any part of Postgres.
> Perhaps what you're dealing with there is that "/usr/bin/make" is some
> particularly ancient release of GNU make that has most but not quite all
> of the features we depend on? "make -v" might prove informative.
>

Not particularly!! Don't know what it is but it doesn't _appear_ to be
GNU. According to "man make" it is a "FreeBSD General Command."
I can tell you that "./configure && make && make install" works and
builds a working Postgres server just fine, it's just the contribs it
doesn't build.

[root(at)byron ~]# make -v
make: no target to make.

[root(at)byron ~]# /usr/bin/make -v
make: no target to make.

[root(at)byron ~]# /usr/local/bin/make -v
GNU Make 3.81
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

This program built for i386-unknown-freebsd6.1
[root(at)byron ~]#

Confusion reigns.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karthikeyan Sundaram 2007-02-18 08:15:01 How to analyse the indexes in postgres?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-02-17 16:39:42 Re: 8.2 Admin Pack broken?