| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Walter Vaughan <wvaughan(at)steelerubber(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Stored Procedure examples |
| Date: | 2007-02-15 20:06:56 |
| Message-ID: | 45D4BD60.8090808@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> ... I doubt it's likely to be anything like as much work as the
>> operator family reshuffle has been.
>
> [ blink... ] I would not have thought that the opfamily stuff would
> affect pgAdmin at all. Would you mind clarifying what problems it
> caused you?
>
No problems - just changes to the code to allow the user to browse
operators and op classes in 8.3, and addition of the new (C++) classes
to allow the same for op families.
Perfectly normal next-version-support stuff :-)
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bill Moran | 2007-02-15 20:06:57 | Re: Database performance comparison paper. |
| Previous Message | Alexander Elgert | 2007-02-15 20:05:35 | Re: Database performance comparison paper. |