From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Zach Bagnall <zach(dot)bagnall(at)bulletinwireless(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, radhika(at)88thstreet(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql Upgrade 7.4 to 8.2 |
Date: | 2007-02-14 03:00:31 |
Message-ID: | 45D27B4F.4080005@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Zach Bagnall <zach(dot)bagnall(at)bulletinwireless(dot)com> writes:
>>> Seriously though, the PITR recovery mechanism is quite mature and usable.
>
>> I would say it is a good start - and progress is clearly being made. But
>> it wont be "usable" for most serious applications until we have
>> per-database transaction logging and backup recovery.
>
> Don't hold your breath; that's not even on the agenda, much less
> something that's likely to appear soon. If you need separable recovery
> then run a different postmaster instance for each database.
I would have to concur... if you need such a feature I would wonder why
you are running multiple databases within the same cluster at all.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zach Bagnall | 2007-02-14 03:26:24 | Re: Postgresql Upgrade 7.4 to 8.2 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-14 01:12:35 | Re: Postgresql Upgrade 7.4 to 8.2 |