Re: Database corruption.

From: Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Database corruption.
Date: 2007-02-08 02:59:46
Message-ID: 45CA9222.5050009@rentec.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> Hmm, that makes it sound like a plain old data-corruption problem, ie,
> trashed xmin or xmax in some tuple header. Can you do a "select
> count(*)" from this table without getting the error?
>
>
no, select count(*) fails around 25 millions rows.
>>> PostgreSQL 8.1RC1 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc
>>> (GCC) 4.0.1
>>>
>
> [ raised eyebrow... ] You're keeping important data in an RC version
> that you've not updated for more than a year? Your faith in Postgres'
> code quality is touching, but I'd counsel getting onto a more recent
> release.
>
>

> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-08 03:22:30 Re: [GENERAL] date comparisons
Previous Message rob_spellberg 2007-02-08 01:09:26 Re: a request for the 8.1.7 and 8.2.2 tarballs and the good reasons why