From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | nikolay(at)samokhvalov(dot)com |
Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib |
Date: | 2007-02-06 18:30:51 |
Message-ID: | 45C8C95B.7070905@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
> On 2/5/07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> [...]
>> I would suggest we start with what is (I think) simplest and clearest:
>>
>> . catalog support via a simple extension->schema(s) map
>> . initdb installs standard extensions if it finds them, unless told
>> not to
>> . support for adjusting search path.
>
> Why adjusting search_path is needed at all?
>
If the extension installs everything in dedicated namespace(s), I think
we would want to have an option to add those namespaces easily to search
paths. Right now all we can do is to set a search path. It would be
nice, for example, to have support for appending or prepending something
to the search path.
I suspect most apps/extensions don't currently use namespaces much, or
we might well have seen more demand in this area.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2007-02-06 18:33:40 | Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-06 18:27:47 | Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto |