From: | Hannes Dorbath <light(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Retrieving affected tables |
Date: | 2007-02-06 15:16:46 |
Message-ID: | 45C89BDE.7060703@theendofthetunnel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 06.02.2007 15:00, Richard Huxton wrote:
> Hannes Dorbath wrote:
>> On 06.02.2007 14:19, Richard Huxton wrote:
>>>> What is best way to retrieve all affected tables of an select
>>>> statement? (Besides parsing the raw SQL).
>>>
>>> From where? As a client-application function? As a user-callable
>>> function in the server? From within the parse/execute code?
>>
>> From a client application.
>
> Parsing the sql is the only way I can think of.
>
> You could feed it through EXPLAIN I suppose, but there's no way to dump
> the query-plan as a data-structure to the client. You can log a verbose
> query-plan, but that's not going to help you.
EXPLAIN VERBOSE gives me :resorigtbl. I think that is what I was after.
--
Regards,
Hannes Dorbath
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-02-06 15:19:49 | Re: Postgres SQL Syntax |
Previous Message | Matthias.Pitzl | 2007-02-06 15:12:20 | Re: Very strange error |