From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | roopa perumalraja <roopabenzer(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Storing database in cluster (Memory) |
Date: | 2007-02-06 13:24:27 |
Message-ID: | 45C8818B.9000803@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
roopa perumalraja wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As I am inserting 100million rows daily into partitioned tables
> (daily wise), it is getting slower.
What is - the inserts? By how much? What tables? What indexes? How are
you inserting these rows?
> Even the retrivel of data, select
> statement on those tables takes about 30 mintues.
All selects take 30 minutes, regardless what work they do? Or do you
have specific selects that are causing problems?
> I have tried
> increasing the parameters in postgres.conf but still that doesn't
> help me much as the no of rows are huge.
What parameters, to what values? What hardware are you running on? What
load do you place on it?
> Will the idea of storing the
> database in cluster (memory) increase the performance of
> insert/update/select in the table in a suitation like this? Thanks a
> lot in advance.
A better question would be "Why isn't my data being cached?". The
operating-system should cache regularly used files.
Still - more details please roopa and we'll see if anyone can help you.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ümit Öztosun | 2007-02-06 13:49:33 | Very strange error |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-02-06 13:19:34 | Re: Retrieving affected tables |