Re: Request from training vendor re: home page

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Request from training vendor re: home page
Date: 2007-02-05 20:24:21
Message-ID: 45C79275.3080109@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Josh Berkus wrote:
> WWW,
>
> You may or may not have noticed that we're getting a bit of jockeying for
> home page spots among our training vendors. It's obviously not in our
> interest to have different vendors manipulating the details of their
> events announcements, or even posting duplicates, in order to "control"
> what appears on the home page. One of the vendors involved had this
> suggestion:
>
>> Just a thought...I notice that now "training" is split out separately on
>> the PostgreSQL.org web site...which is great in the sense that
>> non-training events don't get pushed off the front page by training
>> events (or event spam...).
>>
>> I'm wondering if its possible to "somewhat equalize" things by
>> preventing a single vendor event from appearing more than once on the
>> front page. The idea being that training vendors (which are generally
>> for-profit) would get equal opportunity for that ever-important
>> front-page exposure...
>
> Seems like a decent idea; does it make sense to other people? How would we
> enforce it?
>

Well, they're ordered by date. So if two vendors have a similar number
of offerings, they should show up the same amount of time. As for
duplicates, the person approving the event is *supposed* to look for
that. Now, I realise we're all probably guilty of not always doing that,
but...

Not sure how we'd filter it otherwise, but I'm open for ideas :-)

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-02-05 20:25:25 Request from training vendor re: home page
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-02-05 20:21:23 Re: How to coordinate web team for security releases?