Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib
Date: 2007-02-05 17:19:51
Message-ID: 45C76737.6090109@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim Nasby wrote:
> There was also mention of having a means to tell pg_dump not to dump
> extensions...
>

What's the use case for that? What will we do if there are db objects
that depend on some extensions? Given that there will be some uninstall
support, this one seems less necessary.

I really think we should approach this by not trying to do everything at
once.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-02-05 17:26:01 Re: [previously on HACKERS] "Compacting" a relation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-05 17:16:42 Re: psql possible TODO