Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, me(at)oisinglynn(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches
Date: 2007-02-02 19:11:02
Message-ID: 45C38CC6.1090006@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Obviously edb
>>> doesn't feel the need, since Dave's not been ordered to :-)
>> I'm left to my own devices as far as community work is concerned. Which
>> is nice :-)
>
> Well, if edb had customers *using* it, I'm sure they would tell you to
> do it even if you didn't want to :-)

Quite probably.

/D

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgsql-user 2007-02-02 20:56:07 Rule, update and aggregate functions
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-02-02 18:57:57 Re: Re: pgAdmin III and pgpass was I "might" have found a bug on 8.2.1 win32