Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>> Also, three just seems like a sensible number to maintain. I kinda
>>> like Magnus' idea to put older releases into a sort of 'retired' mode
>>> though, and build only the binaries for PostgreSQL itself.
>> The other option would be for one or more Windows users to step forward
>> and say "I'll package 8.0 if I get some help".
>>
> Or in case one of the PostgreSQL support companies actually have
> customers running this that needs it, they could do it. Obviously edb
> doesn't feel the need, since Dave's not been ordered to :-)

Nor does CMD.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> //Magnus
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/