Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: me(at)oisinglynn(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches
Date: 2007-02-02 18:16:18
Message-ID: 45C37FF2.1060706@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Dave Page wrote:
>
> Also, three just seems like a sensible number to maintain. I kinda like
> Magnus' idea to put older releases into a sort of 'retired' mode though,
> and build only the binaries for PostgreSQL itself.

The other option would be for one or more Windows users to step forward
and say "I'll package 8.0 if I get some help".

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2007-02-02 18:20:54 Re: Defining and Using variables in a postgres function
Previous Message Lincoln Yeoh 2007-02-02 18:07:43 Re: Problem with Online-Backup