From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib |
Date: | 2007-01-28 21:58:38 |
Message-ID: | 45BD1C8E.4080909@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> Well to me that gets a little messy. I mean:
>>
>> pg_catalog,public,<user schemas>,xml2,ltree (just to get a could
>> functions?) etc...
>
> Not as messy as trying to drop or re-create a package when there are
> already 500 functions in the public schema.
I am not sure I understand the correlation. I am not suggesting we
install anything into public. They would all go into a single additional
schema called extensions or some such.
>>>> Obviously the initdb switch could also be selective:
>>>>
>>>> initdb --enable-extensions
>>> If it were an initdb switch, I'd want to have something more like
>>>
>>> --enable-extension=earthdistance
>> And have to parse for each extension?
>
> I don't see this as a big problem.
Well I am not really interesting in this. Someone else is welcome to try
that.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-28 21:59:59 | Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-01-28 21:52:27 | Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib |