| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Change of pg_trigger.tg_enabled and adding | 
| Date: | 2007-01-26 00:25:18 | 
| Message-ID: | 45B94A6E.1030606@Yahoo.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On 1/25/2007 6:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>> The value definitions of tg_enabled would be
> 
>>      A   fires always
>>      N   fires never
>>      O   fires on transaction origin only
>>      R   fires on replica only
> 
>> A new per session GUC variable, restricted to superusers, will define if 
>> the session is in origin or replica mode.
> 
> Are you sure two states are enough?
Good question. I don't know. I'd rather error on the safe side and make 
it multiple states, for now I only have Normal and Replica mode.
> 
> No particular objection, but now would be the time to think if a boolean
> is sufficient.
> 
>> Likewise the system catalog pg_rewrite is extended with an attribute 
>> ev_enabled. It will have the same possible values and a new command, 
> 
> I assume there'd be no intention of supporting on-the-fly changes of
> this setting (ie, you'd set the GUC variable once at session startup
> and not change thereafter)?  Otherwise you'd have a problem with cached
> plans.
This is indeed the intended use pattern. Since it is restricted to 
superusers, I don't see a particular reason why to enforce it in the 
system though.
Jan
-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-26 00:26:34 | Re: No ~ operator for box, point | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-25 23:55:46 | Re: Proposal: Change of pg_trigger.tg_enabled and adding pg_rewrite.ev_enabled |