From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 |
Date: | 2007-01-25 19:53:40 |
Message-ID: | 45B90AC4.6090508@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 1/19/2007 12:32 PM, Brian Hurt wrote:
> Good comparison (for Postgres, anyways) from digg:
>
> http://blog.page2rss.com/2007/01/postgresql-vs-mysql-performance.html
I liked particularly this user comment:
"Now, the MySQL performance using the new techniques beats Postgres
performance using the old techniques."
So optimizing a crappy database for MySQL makes it faster than running
the crappy database on Postgres ... I never expected that one.
Jan
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-01-29 19:21:45 | Oracle to launch Unbrakable MySQL? |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2007-01-24 20:14:34 | Re: Linuxworld Toronto, April 30 - May 2 |