| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Date: | 2007-01-24 23:02:47 |
| Message-ID: | 45B7E597.2040006@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> IIRC Tom's main objection to the previous proposal was that it involved
>> large grammar changes, which I understand is not now proposed.
>>
>
> No, they're already in there --- the patch seems to have been written
> according to that proposal despite the objections.
>
>
>
Oh. ouch.
That seems strange given this query from Oleg back on 18 Nov:
> So, if we'll not touch grammar, are there any issues with tsearch2 in core ?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeremy Drake | 2007-01-24 23:15:36 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-01-24 22:33:19 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeremy Drake | 2007-01-24 23:15:36 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-01-24 22:33:19 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |