From: | Garth Keesler <garthk(at)gdcjk(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PGGeneral <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Multiple column indexes |
Date: | 2007-01-19 20:09:01 |
Message-ID: | 45B1255D.90307@gdcjk.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I thought as much.
Thanx for the reply,
Garth
Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 1/19/07, Garth Keesler <garthk(at)gdcjk(dot)com> wrote:
>> I have a primary key made up of two varchar(128) columns, typically less
>> than 16 chars each. Concatenating the two columns would still be unique.
>> Would it make sense to concat the two columns, using a unique separator
>> like '~' and index on that single column or would that be more trouble
>> than the potential performance gains?
>
> yes. use a multiple key index. that is what they are for. or let the
> db do it for you:
>
> create table foo (a text, b text, primary key(a,b));
>
> merlin
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
> .
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karen Hill | 2007-01-19 20:12:34 | Re: Spam from EnterpriseDB? |
Previous Message | Scott Ribe | 2007-01-19 19:55:09 | Re: Clearing plans |