| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Patrick Earl <patearl(at)patearl(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1. |
| Date: | 2007-01-15 18:31:44 |
| Message-ID: | 45ABC890.9000301@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> But yeah, that's probably a good idea. A quick look at the code says we
>> should at least ask people who have this problem to give it a run with
>> logging at DEBUG5 which should then log exactly what the errorcode was.
>> Or are you seeing more places that need such logging first?
>
> DEBUG5 is going to be a bit voluminous, but let's try that if we can.
Perhaps we should switch down the DEBUG level of it, at least until we
know what happens?
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Demitri Muna | 2007-01-15 18:34:43 | Re: Glacially slow nested SELECT |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-15 18:21:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-15 18:41:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-15 18:23:39 | Re: Autovacuum improvements |