From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jan van der Weijde <Jan(dot)van(dot)der(dot)Weijde(at)attachmate(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Performance with very large tables |
Date: | 2007-01-15 11:29:34 |
Message-ID: | 45AB659E.7070401@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jan van der Weijde wrote:
> Thank you.
> It is true he want to have the first few record quickly and then
> continue with the next records. However without LIMIT it already takes a
> very long time before the first record is returned.
> I reproduced this with a table with 1.1 million records on an XP machine
> and in my case it took about 25 seconds before the select returned the
> first record. I tried it both interactively with pgAdmin and with a
> C-application using a cursor (with hold). Both took about the same time.
That doesn't sound right to me, not for a straigforward SELECT * FROM
where there's no sorting etc.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shoaib Mir | 2007-01-15 11:37:25 | Re: Performance with very large tables |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-01-15 11:26:30 | Re: Performance with very large tables |