| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: -f <output file> option for pg_dumpall |
| Date: | 2007-01-08 23:09:27 |
| Message-ID: | 45A2CF27.8010109@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
>
> It might make sense to provide a programmatic interface to pg_dump to
> provide tools like pgAdmin more flexibility.
Are you talking about "pg_dump in a lib"? Certainly a good idea, because
it allows better integration (e.g. progress bar).
> But it certainly doesn't make sense to re-create the dumping logic.
>
> In terms of integrating pg_dumpall and pg_dump; I don't really care if
> that happens,
I can't make too much sense of integrating pg_dumpall anywhere. Dumping
a whole cluster is certainly much of a planned job, not an interactive
online one, because its output usually won't be usable except for
disaster recovery. Not much function to "re-create" here, single
exception is extracting cluster wide data, the -g option, that's why I
mentioned scripting. But apparently this didn't get into pgadmin svn any
more, so I need to retract this proposal.
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-08 23:56:27 | Strange sort operators vs the regression tests |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-08 22:57:38 | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |