Re: 8.3 pending patch queue

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.3 pending patch queue
Date: 2007-01-08 16:39:25
Message-ID: 45A273BD.9030100@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Right, because even the decision of whether they should be in the queue
> is a decision for us. The hold queue additions are less stringent than
> the main patch queue.

Isn't that always the case though, not just after FF when the hold queue
starts getting activity again? That would imply the need to a permanent
triage(?) queue, and a version specific one imho.

Regards, Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-01-08 16:41:57 Re: [PATCHES] [Fwd: Index Advisor]
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-08 16:35:22 Re: 8.3 pending patch queue