From: | Arnau <arnaulist(at)andromeiberica(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problems restoring big tables |
Date: | 2007-01-08 09:41:32 |
Message-ID: | 45A211CC.80003@andromeiberica.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi all,
>> I have to restore a database that its dump using custom format (-Fc)
>> takes about 2.3GB. To speed the restore first I have restored everything
>> except (played with pg_restore -l) the contents of some tables that's
>> where most of the data is stored.
>
> I think you've outsmarted yourself by creating indexes and foreign keys
> before loading the data. That's *not* the way to make it faster.
I made a mistake saying that I wanted to speed the restore. What I
really meant is the following. I have to migrated that DB from a server
to another, that means I have to stop my production environment. Those
big tables are not really needed to be on production as they are only
statistical data. So what I wanted to do is first of all restore the
important tables and at the end restore the statistics.
So what's the way to do this?
>
>> pg_restore: ERROR: out of memory
>> DETAIL: Failed on request of size 32.
>> CONTEXT: COPY statistics_operators, line 25663678: "137320348 58618027
>
> I'm betting you ran out of memory for deferred-trigger event records.
> It's best to load the data and then establish foreign keys ... indexes
> too. See
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/populate.html
> for some of the underlying theory. (Note that pg_dump/pg_restore
> gets most of this stuff right already; it's unlikely that you will
> improve matters by manually fiddling with the load order. Instead,
> think about increasing maintenance_work_mem and checkpoint_segments,
> which pg_restore doesn't risk fooling with.)
Thank you very much
--
Arnau
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-08 14:47:49 | Re: Need help. Postgres log for prepared statements. |
Previous Message | Guido Barosio | 2007-01-08 03:32:11 | Re: Invalid page header |