I'm not trying to be argumentative, but I honestly don't know what you
mean here...and the only reason I ask for clarification is that you are
probably trying to tell me something important :)
Tom Lane wrote:
>John McCawley <nospam(at)hardgeus(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>While this value isn't 100% absolutely positively guaranteed to never
>>change, it is pretty dang close.
>>
>>
>
>Counterexample: SET ROLE or SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>