From: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | anorganic anorganic <anorganicphc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication |
Date: | 2007-01-04 10:07:13 |
Message-ID: | 459CD1D1.8010002@bluegap.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi,
anorganic anorganic wrote:
>> did you check the manual about 'High Availability and Load
>> Balancing"?
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/high-availability.html
>
> yes but this was really short i think.
Interesting... where exactly is it to short for you? What else would you
expect?
> I need that: s1 and s2 must be multimaster replication asyn. but make
> replication in real time. Changes are immediately send to second server.
Slony can probably be used for such a setup, although it's primarily
designed for single master, async replication.
> OR: s1 is master s2 slave, s1 change some columns on s2, and s2 is
> master s1
> slave and s2 change another columns in one time.
I don't quite follow what you mean here. I assume you mean rows, not
columns. Then probably you mean something like what we call data
partitioning, where each server is a master for a certain subset of the
data.
> I read about slony but, it looks that's make changes not immediatly but in
> packages = not send one transaction but wait and send package. This
> could be a problem.
Hm. If that really is a problem, think again about sync vs. async. In
async replication, there is a delay by definition. But again, I'm not
sure what Slony can do to minimize that delay.
> I hope slony online system is right for me. And these question
> about slony i have more than one i think it could be rigth way. Somebody
> who run it could be great person for me :).
Probably ask on the slony mailing list. I'm not exactly a slony expert
either.
Regards
Markus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-01-04 10:33:41 | Re: Autovacuum not running in 8.2.0 |
Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2007-01-04 09:13:14 | Re: Replication |