From: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
Subject: | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
Date: | 2007-01-02 19:02:40 |
Message-ID: | 459AAC50.3030405@boreham.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I suspect most postgres developers and companies would like to keep
> things as BSDish as possible.
Right, hence OpenSSL would be the obvious best choice.
In respect of licencing however, NSS is no 'worse' than GNU TLS
because it may be distributed under the GPL and LGPL.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-02 19:05:47 | Re: Rare corruption of pg_class index |
Previous Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2007-01-02 19:01:57 | Re: TODO: Add a GUC to control whether BEGIN inside |