| From: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
| Date: | 2007-01-02 18:20:20 |
| Message-ID: | 459AA264.1010404@boreham.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote:
>* David Boreham (david_list(at)boreham(dot)org) wrote:
>
>
>>Fascinating thread for the holidays. I found it interesting that nobody
>>has mentioned
>>NSS (former Netscape SSL library). It has its own bag of problems of
>>course, but
>>for me is potentially more attractive than GNU TLS. e.g. it has FIPS-140
>>certification
>>and is actively under development by a software company with significant
>>resources.
>>It's also very widely deployed. I'm not saying that OpenSSL is bad (it'd
>>probably be my
>>first choice), just that there is another option besides GNU TLS.
>>
>>
>
>Not sure what license that's under,
>
From http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/:
'NSS is available under the Mozilla Public License, the GNU General
Public License, and the GNU Lesser General Public License.'
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D. Hageman | 2007-01-02 18:23:59 | 8.2 Crash on Query |
| Previous Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2007-01-02 18:04:46 | Re: TODO: Add a GUC to control whether BEGIN inside |