| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL JDBC List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: |
| Date: | 2002-11-06 00:11:09 |
| Message-ID: | 4592.1036541469@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> writes:
> I thought about this, and it presumes that the driver knows that it is
> in a transaction. At this point the driver has tried to stay pretty
> lightweight assuming the programmer would take care of these things, so
> it doesn't even know that it is in a transaction.
One of the proposals on the table for 7.4 is to extend the FE/BE
protocol so that the backend will report its in-transaction status
at the end of each query cycle. Not sure if that'll help you.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nic Ferrier | 2002-11-06 00:52:30 | streaming result sets: progress |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-06 00:09:56 | Re: |