Re: Partitioning Vs. Split Databases - performance?

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioning Vs. Split Databases - performance?
Date: 2006-12-22 08:19:16
Message-ID: 458B9504.7090702@cox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/22/06 01:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:
>> Besides, since pg_dump is single-threaded, backing up a huge
>> database gets impossible. Federating the database allows multiple
>> pg_dumps to simultaneously dump data to multiple tape drives.
>
> ... as long as you don't care about having a self-consistent dump ...

Nothing's perfect.

A pg_backup that writes multiple simultaneous data streams that are,
when taken as a unit, self-consistent would be tres' useful for Very
Large databases.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFi5UES9HxQb37XmcRAsinAJ0dkMdqdg3ROr9Jmpv6mtmhXaZubwCgi3PK
SfisJNzbFz/N5wR92tslHQ0=
=goE1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rafal Pietrak 2006-12-22 08:57:22 Re: Password strength requirements
Previous Message Wong Jowo 2006-12-22 08:07:17 Re: Need help on "org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command"