Re: Proposed ISO solution to Male/female

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed ISO solution to Male/female
Date: 2006-12-08 22:15:10
Message-ID: 4579E3EE.1060602@cox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/08/06 14:40, Richard Troy wrote:
>
> <big-snip>
>
[snip]
> 0 = unknown
> 1 = male
> 2 = female
> 3 =
> 4 = female to male transgender
> 5 = male to female transgender
> 6 =
> 7 = hermaphrodite
> 8 = declined to state
> 9 = Neuter - Not applicable
>
> Hmmm... Easy to write the various functions making this a new datatype...

Is TG a biological state or a social state?

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFeePuS9HxQb37XmcRAmlqAKClbhVBWXtc0QPrrg5dju4+EknmYQCgmwmo
UpoNGTbY1o6zcygdKivlh5w=
=vTq9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Russ Brown 2006-12-08 22:17:18 Re: Performance figures from DbMail list
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2006-12-08 22:13:32 Re: Performance figures from DbMail list