| From: | Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Marking indexes out of date (WAS: loading data, creating |
| Date: | 2006-12-08 22:12:18 |
| Message-ID: | 4579E342.9050403@nwlink.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:49:30PM -0800, Glen Parker wrote:
>> I'd like to see a general way to take indexes off line without actually
>> losing their definitions. For example, something like "ALTER TABLE [EN
>> | DIS] ABLE INDEXES", "ALTER INDEX [EN | DIS] ABLE", etc. This could
>> also be used internally when a backend encounters an error
>> reading/writing an index. Rather than refusing to execute queries, it
>> could just ignore indexes it knows are disabled or bad in some way and
>> re-plan as needed.
>
> One issue would be that even disabled indexes would need to be updated
> when there are new rows. If you don't update the index when it's
> disabled, then re-enabling will essentially need to rebuild the index.
That's what I had in mind. You could just as easily blow away the index
file(s). It's just that I don't want it to toss the index *definition*.
To continued to update such an index would be to completely negate the
benefit of disabling it!
-Glen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2006-12-08 22:13:32 | Re: Performance figures from DbMail list |
| Previous Message | Erik Jones | 2006-12-08 22:08:07 | Re: Performance figures from DbMail list |