| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Male/female |
| Date: | 2006-12-08 19:06:13 |
| Message-ID: | 4579B7A5.4020805@cox.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/06 09:31, John Meyer wrote:
> Second method might be better.
Too much heat from declaring "Males are True, Females are False"?
> Of course, you could also do a one chracter gender "M/F" if you want to
> save space.
>
> Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
>> Just wondering.....how do list member represent gender when storing
>> details of people in a database?
>>
>> I've done it two ways:
>>
>> * A bool column, with the understanding that true/false represents
>> one gender or the other.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFebelS9HxQb37XmcRAqBEAKC+j4K1JBaGmDT97ZZTWzkH9mnHLACg2nhZ
dc5p75EU28La2LM7blNseEg=
=/Wt6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2006-12-08 19:08:58 | Re: Male/female |
| Previous Message | Steve Crawford | 2006-12-08 19:04:59 | Re: Male/female |