From: | Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Mindaugas <mind(at)bi(dot)lt> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Core 2 or Opteron |
Date: | 2006-12-07 10:29:48 |
Message-ID: | 4577ED1C.1040600@tweakers.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
These benchmarks are all done using 64 bit linux:
http://tweakers.net/reviews/646
Best regards,
Arjen
On 7-12-2006 11:18 Mindaugas wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We're planning new server or two for PostgreSQL and I'm wondering Intel
> Core 2 (Woodcrest for servers?) or Opteron is faster for PostgreSQL now?
>
> When I look through hardware sites Core 2 wins. But I believe those tests
> mostly are being done in 32 bits. Does the picture change in 64 bits?
>
> And I also remember that in PostgreSQL Opteron earlier had huge advantage
> over older Xeons. But did Intel manage to change picture now?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mindaugas
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claus Guttesen | 2006-12-07 10:44:48 | Re: Core 2 or Opteron |
Previous Message | Mindaugas | 2006-12-07 10:18:21 | Core 2 or Opteron |