From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Wei Weng <wweng(at)kencast(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Anything I can do to speed up this query? |
Date: | 2006-12-06 10:18:22 |
Message-ID: | 457698EE.1070902@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Wei Weng wrote:
> I have a table that has roughly 200,000 entries and many columns.
>
> The query is very simple:
>
> SELECT Field1, Field2, Field3... FieldN FROM TargetTable;
>
> TargetTable has an index that is Field1.
>
> The thing is on this machine with 1Gig Ram, the above query still takes
> about 20 seconds to finish. And I need it to run faster, ideally around
> 5 seconds.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Seq Scan on TargetTable (cost=0.00..28471.72 rows=210872 width=988)
> (actual time=0.037..6084.385 rows=211286 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 6520.499 ms
Thats 988 * 211286 =~ 200MB of data. Since the explain-analyse completes
in 6.5secs that would mean you're spending 13.5 seconds building the
result-set, transferring it and processing it at the client end.
That will take up at least 400MB of RAM (realistically more) - I'd
suggest you'd be better off with a cursor, unless you really need the
whole thing in one go.
If you do need all the data at once, you'll want a faster CPU and faster
RAM I guess.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Leonard Soetedjo | 2006-12-06 10:43:18 | Re: Error in installing compat-postgresql-libs rpm |
Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-12-06 09:26:02 | Re: Error in installing compat-postgresql-libs rpm |