From: | Ted Byers <r(dot)ted(dot)byers(at)rogers(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
Cc: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, "Uwe C(dot) Schroeder" <uwe(at)oss4u(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Simpler dump? |
Date: | 2007-12-10 17:47:15 |
Message-ID: | 45730.65419.qm@web88305.mail.re4.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks All. I learned plenty this morning.
--- Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> wrote:
> On 12/10/07, Ted Byers <r(dot)ted(dot)byers(at)rogers(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > OK. A worry. How is template_postgis
> constructed?
> > Is it just a handy reference to template1? Or
> does it
> > exist independantly? I don't want to be dropping
> > template1 only to find that breaking
> template_postgis.
>
> All databases are separate entities--the data copy
> only happens at
> creation time, based on the template you specify.
> The
> 'template_postgis' DB is not a standard PG database,
> so either it's
> created by the PostGIS install, or someone at your
> site set it up.
>
> It sounds like the thing for you to do is drop
> template1 (which will
> have no effect on template_postgis), create it again
> from template0,
> and use template_postgis when you need it (otherwise
> template1 will be
> used by default for new databases).
>
Great! Thanks for this. I appreciate it.
Ted
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Harrison | 2007-12-10 17:51:04 | Re: slony question |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-12-10 17:37:35 | Re: slony question |