Re: Bad iostat numbers

From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
To: carlos(dot)reimer(at)opendb(dot)com(dot)br
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bad iostat numbers
Date: 2006-12-01 02:24:34
Message-ID: 456F9262.4080207@boreham.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Carlos H. Reimer wrote:

>
>
> avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %idle
>
> 50.40 0.00 0.50 1.10 48.00
>
>
>
> Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s rkB/s wkB/s
> avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
>
> sda 0.00 7.80 0.40 6.40 41.60 113.60 20.80
> 56.80 22.82 570697.50 10.59 147.06 100.00
>
> sdb 0.20 7.80 0.60 6.40 40.00 113.60 20.00
> 56.80 21.94 570697.50 9.83 142.86 100.00
>
> md1 0.00 0.00 1.20 13.40 81.60 107.20 40.80
> 53.60 12.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>
> md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>
>
>
> Are they not saturated?
>
>
>
> What kind of parameters should I pay attention when comparing SCSI
> controllers and disks? I would like to discover how much cache is
> present in the controller, how can I find this value from Linux?
>
>
These number look a bit strange. I am wondering if there is a hardware
problem on one of the drives
or on the controller. Check in syslog for messages about disk timeouts
etc. 100% util but 6 writes/s
is just wrong (unless the drive is a 1980's vintage floppy).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2006-12-01 03:00:05 Re: Bad iostat numbers
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2006-12-01 01:47:24 Re: Bad iostat numbers