Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues
Date: 2006-11-28 16:02:21
Message-ID: 456C092C.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 5:44 AM, in message
<E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA579018FE15F(at)m0143(dot)s-mxs(dot)net>,
"Zeugswetter
Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> wrote:

>> "SELECT *". It's unfortunate that we have to go through another
>> initdb
>
> You can certainly find a workaround to not need an initdb.

That would save some time.

> drop indexes based on the changed to_char function,

There are none.

> verify other incompatible changes since beta3 ?? anybody think of
> something else ?

Anybody?

> shutdown the db,
> binary edit the new version into pg_control,

Anything besides offset 000C to 000F?

> start db with new version,
> recreate the changed system view,

Are these all of them?:

pg_stat_all_tables
pg_stat_sys_tables
pg_stat_user_tables

Any special tricks to replacing these in a database that's been in
use?

Thanks,

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-11-28 16:02:42 Re: Short writes
Previous Message Chris Browne 2006-11-28 15:59:23 Re: FAQs and Port Status