From: | Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | totally different plan when using partitions |
Date: | 2009-08-12 11:05:07 |
Message-ID: | 456730.1972.qm@web24604.mail.ird.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
query using partitions explicitly ("1"):
explain analyze
select nome1,
thv3tralacc,
dltbfpgpdch
FROM cell_bsc_60_0610 as cell_bsc
left outer join teststscell73_0610_1 as data on data.ne_id=cell_bsc.nome1
left outer join teststscell13_0610_1 as data1 on data1.ne_id=cell_bsc.nome1 and data1.time=data.time
where
data.time >=cell_bsc.starttime and data.time <=cell_bsc.endtime and
data.time between '2006-10-01 00:00:00' and '2006-10-06 00:00:00'
and data1.time >=cell_bsc.starttime and data1.time <=cell_bsc.endtime
and data1.time between '2006-10-01 00:00:00' and '2006-10-06 00:00:00'
and cell_bsc.nome2=2
explain analyze:
http://explain-analyze.info/query_plans/3805-query-plan-2509
same query, but using postgresql's partition pruning ("2"):
explain analyze
select nome1,
thv3tralacc,
dltbfpgpdch
FROM cell_bsc_60_0610 as cell_bsc
left outer join teststscell73 as data on data.ne_id=cell_bsc.nome1
left outer join teststscell13 as data1 on data1.ne_id=cell_bsc.nome1 and data1.time=data.time
where
data.time >=cell_bsc.starttime and data.time <=cell_bsc.endtime and
data.time between '2006-10-01 00:00:00' and '2006-10-06 00:00:00'
and data1.time >=cell_bsc.starttime and data1.time <=cell_bsc.endtime
and data1.time between '2006-10-01 00:00:00' and '2006-10-06 00:00:00'
and cell_bsc.nome2=2
explain analyze:
http://explain-analyze.info/query_plans/3807-query-plan-2511
The second version is A LOT slower (10x). But the 2 queries should be identical... why the two totally different plans???
As you can see in query "1" I just put the used table, in query "2" postgres uses exactly the table I put in "1" (plus the empty tables that are the "father" of the other tables); so I don't understand why the 2 plans...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam Mason | 2009-08-12 11:47:08 | Re: comparing NEW and OLD (any good this way?) |
Previous Message | Alan Millington | 2009-08-12 09:59:37 | plpython.dll dependencies |