| From: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
| Cc: | replica-hooks-discuss(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, " José Orlando =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_Pereira?=" <jop(at)lsd(dot)di(dot)uminho(dot)pt>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alfranio Correia <alfranio(at)lsd(dot)di(dot)uminho(dot)pt> |
| Subject: | Re: Integrating Replication into Core |
| Date: | 2006-11-23 15:02:52 |
| Message-ID: | 4565B81C.6070204@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
David Boreham wrote:
> I've worked on an emulated test rig for a replication system (not RDBMS
> but for LDAP).
> We used netem (OSS)
Thanks. I've already heard about that one some while ago, but didn't
remember it. I'll have another look.
> for the network emulation and a pile of python and
> shell scripts and
> C client test apps.
> Testing replication is hard, of course, and you have to roll most of it
> yourself :(
Yeah, I'm also using python for that.
>> If you know such a thing, please email me! (I've looked at STAF, but
>> that seems overly complex and targeted at completely different use-case.)
>
> In my experience test frameworks tend to provide less useful
> functionality than one might hope.
> Sometimes to the point that they're hardly worth bothering with at all.
ACK. Same experience here.
Regards
Markus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-11-23 15:06:37 | Re: Integrating Replication into Core |
| Previous Message | David Boreham | 2006-11-23 14:29:37 | Re: Integrating Replication into Core |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-11-23 15:06:37 | Re: Integrating Replication into Core |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-23 14:49:44 | Re: 8.2 open items list |