Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'

From: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007Marketing(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
Date: 2006-11-22 17:21:49
Message-ID: 4564872D.7070806@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On a side note to this.. you said *into*.. my understanding is the
> policy of the community is *no* replication is in core.

I don't think that policy is written in stone. But for a replication
solution to go into core, it should better cover a lot of use cases,
i.e. for sure sync *and* async replication.

Regards

Markus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-11-22 17:30:54 Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-11-22 17:15:08 Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-11-22 17:30:54 Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-11-22 17:15:08 Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'