| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl |
| Date: | 2006-11-20 20:21:49 |
| Message-ID: | 45620E5D.4040909@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>>> Since this is a behaviour modification, do we want to apply it to the
>>> back branches? Doing so would certainly be possible, although it would
>>> be non-trivial.
>>>
>
>
>> I have committed this to HEAD at any rate, so that we can get some
>> buildfarm testing going.
>>
>
> My vote is to leave it just in HEAD; there may be someone out there
> depending on plperl and plperlu being in the same interpreter, and
> breaking their code in a minor release doesn't seem very friendly.
>
>
>
Fine by me.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Buttafuoco | 2006-11-20 20:53:58 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-11-20 20:20:29 | Re: Localization of abbreviated day names |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-11-20 20:33:33 | Re: xlog lockup patch (was: BUG #2712: could not fsync |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-11-20 19:31:27 | Re: Update to mingw FAQ |