From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |
Date: | 2006-11-17 08:21:07 |
Message-ID: | 455D70F3.8050709@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> a) is this a bad idea?
Maybe - see below...
> b) would they be affected because they don't use SMTP AUTH
I use SMTP AUTH + TLS through my own server to avoid having plain text
passwords on the wire, and because when I'm sending large emails (ie.
pgAdmin test builds) it is a heck of a lot quicker than sending to a
server on the other side of the planet which can often be slow at the
times I send messages (ie. when you're doing backups).
For similar reasons I don't IMAP directly to your servers - it's just
too slow. I forward to mine and IMAPS to there.
and c) why aren't you using SMTP
> AUTH? ...
See above.
Please don't add SPF for postgresql.org - unless you're willing to add a
record for developer.pgadmin.org as well.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-11-17 08:41:46 | Re: SPF Record ... |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-11-17 08:06:57 | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |