From: | Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "AMIR FRANCO D(dot) JOVEN" <amir(at)digi(dot)ph> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Slow SELECT on three or more clients |
Date: | 2006-11-15 14:47:04 |
Message-ID: | 455B2868.7010303@logix-tt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Amir,
AMIR FRANCO D. JOVEN wrote:
> My current project uses PostgreSQL 7.3.4.
By all means, please upgrade.
The newest 7.3 series version is 7.3.16, which fixes lots of critical
bugs, and can be used as a drop-in replacement for 7.3.4 (see Release
Notes at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/interactive/release.html )
The newest stable release is 8.1.5, and 8.2 is just on the roads...
> I have a table with 94 fields and a select with only one resultset in
> only one client consumes about 0.86 seconds.
"with only on resultset"?
You mean "with only one returned row", I presume.
Each SELECT has exactly one resultset, which can contain zero to many rows.
Please check the following:
- Did you create the appropriate indices?
- Version 7.3.X may suffer from index bloat, so REINDEX might help.
- Did you VACUUM and ANALYZE the table properly?
- Is your free space map setting, the statistics targets, and other
config options tuned to fit your environment?
- Maybe a VACUUM FULL or a CLUSTER command may help you.
> for a single select with one field in one resultset, is 0.86 seconds normal?
That depends on the circumstances.
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig A. James | 2006-11-15 16:31:42 | Hundreds of database and FSM |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-11-15 14:17:42 | Re: Slow SELECT on three or more clients |